Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & EMBASE  
     Home | Subscribe | Feedback  

CASE REPORT
[Download PDF
 
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 186-189  

Ureterocolic fistula diagnosed on the basis of diuretic renogram and direct radionuclide cystography

AS Manglunia1, S Kini2, S Pawar1, S Patwardhan2,  
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seth G.S. Medical College & K.E.M. Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Urology, Seth G.S. Medical College & K.E.M. Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. S Pawar
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seth G.S. Medical College & K.E.M. Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

Ureterocolic fistulae are a rare phenomenon and are most commonly seen secondary to obstructive ureteric calculi. These are usually diagnosed on barium enema or intravenous urography. Most of the times, more than one investigation is needed to confirm the findings. We present a case of iatrogenically-induced ureterocolic fistula, diagnosed on renogram and direct radionuclide cystography. This case showcases the possibility of using a renogram study as a diagnostic tool for a suspected ureterocolic fistula. A renogram study also enables to asess the renal function, which is essential in deciding the management.



How to cite this article:
Manglunia A S, Kini S, Pawar S, Patwardhan S. Ureterocolic fistula diagnosed on the basis of diuretic renogram and direct radionuclide cystography.J Postgrad Med 2018;64:186-189


How to cite this URL:
Manglunia A S, Kini S, Pawar S, Patwardhan S. Ureterocolic fistula diagnosed on the basis of diuretic renogram and direct radionuclide cystography. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 May 29 ];64:186-189
Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2018/64/3/186/234681


Full Text



 Introduction



Fistulas of the genitourinary system can be classified as those involving the upper urinary tract (kidneys, ureter), lower urinary tract (bladder, urethra), or the female reproductive tract (vagina, uterus). They can form abnormal communications within the urinary tract or involve gastrointestinal tract, vascular system, lymphatic system, and skin.

Out of those involving the alimentary system, ureterocolic fistulae are very uncommon and are diagnosed using intravenous urography (IVU), computed tomography (CT), or retrograde pyelography.

At the time of publication of this report, very few cases of ureterocolic fistulae have been reported in the online literature to the best of authors' knowledge; none of which have been diagnosed on a renogram. We present a case of iatrogenically induced ureterocolic fistula, diagnosed on renogram and direct radionuclide cystography (DRC).

 Case Report



A 35-year-old lady, presented to the urology department with a 10-month history of pain in the left flank. This was associated with fever, chills, and diarrhea. She had undergone a Shirodkar sling operation in 2001 for uterine prolapse. On enquiry, the patient revealed history of pneumaturia and watery diarrhea since the sling surgery. Physical examination revealed a poorly nourished woman with mild tenderness in the left flank and no other apparent abnormality. Urinalysis showed high white blood cell counts. The urine contained Gram-negative rods, but no acid-fast bacilli. An ultrasound examination of the left kidney showed mild fullness of the pelvicalyceal system (PCS) with non-visualization of the ureter. IVU showed delayed nephrogram and excretion of the left kidney with hydronephrosis, proximal hydroureter, and non-visualization of the distal ureter. Suspecting obstructive uropathy, a diuretic renogram study was ordered to evaluate the left renal function and excretion.

Tc-99m ethylene dicysteine (Tc-99m EC) dynamic renal scintigraphy was carried out with F+0 protocol. 5 mCi (185 MBq) Tc-99m EC was injected intravenously (IV) along with 40 mg of inj. furosemide IV at the beginning of the study. The differential function of the left kidney was approximately 35%, with visualization of the upper and middle left ureter [Figure 1]. Urinary bladder was visualized from the third minute of the study. There was presence of extra-urinary tracer activity inferolateral to the left kidney in early images, with retrograde movement of tracer from the left iliac fossa toward the left hypochondriac region. Subsequent static images show further accumulation [Figure 2]. Single photon emission CT (SPECT-CT) images localized this activity to the descending colon [Figure 3]. This indicated the presence of an abnormal communication between the colon and urinary bladder or ureter.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}

For further characterization of the nature of abnormal urine accumulation and to rule out presence of a fistula between the urinary bladder and bowel, a DRC was carried out on a separate occasion. The procedure was explained to the patient and written informed consent was obtained. 37 MBq (1.0 mCi) was introduced aseptically into the urinary bladder and then the bladder was filled with nonradioactive saline through a per urethral catheter and the study was carried out as per EANM guidelines.[1] During the voiding phase, dynamic image acquisiton was carried out in posterior projection at a rate of 2 s per frame., until micutrition was complete.

The study showed normal tracer concentration in the urinary bladder with no evidence of vesicoureteral reflux or any extra-vesical tracer accumualtion [Figure 4]. This ruled out the possibility of colovesical fistula. By exclusion, the findings of the Tc-99m EC renogram thus suggested the presence of a ureterocolic fistula. This was consistent with the history of the patient, suggesting iatrogenic injury being the cause of ureterocolic fistula.{Figure 4}

Exploratory surgery was then carried out and it showed a left ureter severely adherent to the descending colon [Figure 5]. Successful repair was carried out.{Figure 5}

Diuretic renogram and DRC study thus demonstrated the presence of a left ureterocolic fistula, which was not diagnosed on both USG and IVU. The EC renogram and DRC together were helpful in determining the location of the fistula and in planning surgical management.

 Discussion



Causes of ureterocolic fistula include urinary tract calculi, iatrogenic trauma, diverticulitis, radiation therapy, transitional cell carcinoma, and tuberculosis.[2],[3] A ureteric calculus often complicated by obstruction and pyelonephritis is the most common cause. A fistulous tract can develop in any area affected by chronic inflammation, necrosis, or ischemia.[4] Patients with uretero-alimentary tract fistulas can present with varied symptoms depending on the etiology. Complaints include flank pain, hematuria, recurrent urinary tract infections, pneumaturia, and diarrhea. Reflux of colonic contents through the fistula results in chronic urinary tract infection. In cases of obstructing ureteral calculus, pneumaturia and fecaluria are uncommon. Passage of urine per rectum is rare because higher colonic pressures lead to predominantly unidirectional flow across the fistula.[5]

Ureterocolic fistulae may be diagnosed using either urological or gastrointestinal imaging. Often, more than one investigation is needed to confirm the findings. Excretory urography, retrograde pyelography, and contrast-enhanced CT are frequently used procedures in a suspected case. An intravenous pyelogram may identify the fistula, although a poorly functioning kidney will make this less useful. A retrograde pyelogram can be used to determine the exact location of the fistula. An antegrade or retrograde ureterogram are the most sensitive imaging modalities available for the detection and characterization of the fistulous tract.[6]

Quantification of renal function on the affected site is important to plan the definitive surgery. Management may involve percutaneous nephrostomy and stent placement for urinary drainage with possible surgical resection. If there is persistent poor renal function, a nephroureterectomy, fistulectomy, segmental colonic resection, and primary colonic re-anastomosis are the possible definitive surgical treatment options. A temporary ureteral stent across the fistulous connection may be of benefit before definitive surgery by reducing the amount of periureteral inflammation. In non-surgical candidates, placement of a ureteral stent is the treatment of choice.

Although visualization of fistula is also possible by anatomical imaging, dynamic imaging provides more information such as the size and precise location. Moreover, diuretic renogram also aids in quantifying the renal function, which aids in management and treatment planning.

As per the author's knowledge, this is the first report in literature of such a fistula being diagnosed by a renogram. This case brings to light the possibility of incorporation of dynamic renal scinitigraphy in evaluation of patients with suspected urinary tract fistulas.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that appropriate patient consent was obtained.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Fettich J, Colarinha P, Fischer S, Frokier J, Gordon I, Hahn K, et al. Guidelines for direct radionuclide cystography in children. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:B39-44.
2Patil KP, Shetty SD, Anandan N, Ibrahim A. Ureterocolic fistula due to impacted ureteral stone. Br J Urol 1992;70:332-3.
3Noordzij JW, Garibyan H, Kurth KH. Ureterocolic fistula. Eur Urol 1991;19:85-6.
4Lee WK, Chang SD, Rooche CJ, Duddalwar VA, Rowley VA, McLoughlin MG. Spontaneous ureterocolic fistula secondary to calculus pyohyrdoureternonephrosis. Br J Radiol 2005;78:954-5.
5Cirocco WC, Priolo SR, Golub RW. Spontaneous ureterocolic fistula: A rare complication of colonic diverticular disease. Am Surg 1994;60:832-5.
6Flood HD, Jones B, Grainger R. Ureterocolic fistula: A unique complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1992;147:122-4.

 
Sunday, May 29, 2022
 Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright  and disclaimer