Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & EMBASE  
     Home | Subscribe | Feedback  

LETTER
[Download PDF
 
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 166  

Body packer syndrome

B Sureka, MM Kumar, A Mittal, S Mukul 
 Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging,Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
B Sureka
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging,Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
India




How to cite this article:
Sureka B, Kumar M M, Mittal A, Mukul S. Body packer syndrome.J Postgrad Med 2013;59:166-166


How to cite this URL:
Sureka B, Kumar M M, Mittal A, Mukul S. Body packer syndrome. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 May 19 ];59:166-166
Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2013/59/2/166/113824


Full Text

Dear Editor,

We read with great interest the article on body packer syndrome by Kulkarni et al., published in the July-September issue of 2012. [1] We wish to highlight an important radiological sign, share our experience, and add data on the management of these patients.

The sign seen on the X-ray is known as 'double-condom sign'. This sign is due to the air trapped in the individual layers of packing material. [2] This sign is said to be a diagnostic criterion of body packer syndrome. Computed tomography (CT) has an advantage over plain radiographs, especially in those regions where the drug-filled packets maybe confused with formed feces.

Recently, we encountered a similar case of a body packer arrested by custom officials of Delhi International Airport. A 36-year-old foreigner was brought by custom officials and admitted to the Emergency Department. At admission, the patient was alert, co-operative, and asymptomatic. His medical history was uneventful, and vital signs and physical examination were normal. A plain X-ray of the abdomen was done which revealed numerous oval-shaped radio-opacities loaded in the rectum and colon which were delineated by a thin rim of a crescent of air [Figure 1]. Laxatives and bowel irrigation were given to clear bowel contents. Twelve packets of cocaine were recovered [Figure 2].{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

The main objective of treatment in these cases is to promote clearance of cocaine packets in the shortest time possible without causing any physiologic upset. This can be achieved by giving a wide range of laxatives and promotility agents. Liquid paraffin is contraindicated as it can cause deterioration of latex-based packets, resulting in rupture of the packets. [3] The current treatment of choice is whole-bowel irrigation with polyethylene-glycol at a rate of 1.5 L/hour orally, until all packets are passed. Bowel irrigation is contraindicated in the presence of bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and hemodynamic instability. The absolute indications for surgery are signs or symptoms of cocaine intoxication or evidence of bowel obstruction. [4]

References

1Kulkarni VM, Gandhi JA, Gupta RA, Deokar RB, Karnik ND, Nadkar MY. Body packer syndrome. J Postgrad Med 2012;58:225-6.
2De Backer AI, De Keulenaer B, Mortelé KJ, Ros PR. The body packer syndrome. JBR-BTR 2002;85:312.
3Visser L, Stricker B, Hoogendoorn M, Vinks A. Do not give paraffin to packers. Lancet 1998;352:1352.
4de Prost N, Lefebvre A, Questel F, Roche N, Pourriat JL, Huchon G, et al. Prognosis of cocaine body-packers. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:955-8.

 
Thursday, May 19, 2022
 Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright  and disclaimer