Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & EMBASE  
     Home | Subscribe | Feedback  

[Download PDF
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 268  

Laparoscopic orchidopexy

B Banieghbal 
 Division of Paediatric Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Correspondence Address:
B Banieghbal
Division of Paediatric Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
South Africa

How to cite this article:
Banieghbal B. Laparoscopic orchidopexy.J Postgrad Med 2005;51:268-268

How to cite this URL:
Banieghbal B. Laparoscopic orchidopexy. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2005 [cited 2022 May 27 ];51:268-268
Available from:

Full Text

Laparoscopy for impalpable testis is one of the most widely practiced procedures by pediatric laparoscopists; it is traditionally used to exclude vanishing testis syndrome and formulate a plan of management for intra-abdominal testes. Recently, laparoscopic orchidopexy[1] is gaining popularity for impalpable testis with adequate testicular mobility. This article is addressing the dilemma of inguinal hernia noted during this type of operation. The authors have correctly suggested that inguinal hernial closure is not necessary under these conditions as extensive dissection around the internal ring will result in closure of the internal ring.

It should be noted that there is a difference between true inguinal hernia and inguinal hernia associated with undescended testis. Most pediatric surgeons dissect the hernia to free the testicular vessels from this tethering sac as to achieve extra length. It is of little importance whether herniotomy is performed under these circumstances, certainly it is not my practice to routinely suture ligates the sac and no recurrent inguinal hernia is noted over a 15-year period.

The situation is somewhat different in inguinal hernia that is not associated with undescended testis.

Suture ligation of the hernial sac flush with internal ring especially in neonates and premature infants is mandatory and to state otherwise is misleading. Every practicing pediatric surgeon has seen almost immediate recurrence of inguinal hernia when meticulous and proper closure of the sac is not performed. There are many articles that address the issue of laparoscopic hernial closure, and how this is done laparoscopically does affect the outcome,[2] as simple laparoscopic closure without herniotomy has shown to have a high recurrence rate (3% in most large series); current recommendation is complete herniotomy followed by suture ligation of the peritoneal opening.[3]

Finally, my present preferences for intra-abdominal testis diagnosed laparocopically are:[4]

l If the testis can be stretched to contra-lateral internal ring; a preperitoneal approach is adopted.

l If mobility is not adequate then a laparoscopic assisted micro-vascular transfer is performed. In my experience Fowler-Stephen laparoscopic staged orchidopexy has a high atrophy rate and is no longer performed.


1Esposito C, Damiano R, Gonzalez Sabin MA, Savanelli A, Centonze A, Settimi A, et al . Laparoscopy-assisted orchidopexy: an ideal treatment for children with intra-abdominal testes. J Endourol 2002;16:659-62.
2Gorsler CM, Schier F. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in children. Surg Endosc 2003;17:571-3.
3Becmeur F, Philippe P, Lemandat-Schultz A, Moog R, Grandadam S, Lieber A, et al . A continuous series of 96 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in children by a new technique. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1738-41.
4Banieghbal B, Davies M. Laparoscopic evaluation of testicular mobility as a guide to management of intra-abdominal testes. World J Urol 2003;20:343-5.

Friday, May 27, 2022
 Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright  and disclaimer