Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 7756 | | Printed | 132 | | Emailed | 2 | | PDF Downloaded | 12 | | Comments | [Add] | | Cited by others | 6 | |
|

 Click on image for details.
|
|
|
LETTER |
|
|
|
Year : 2012 | Volume
: 58
| Issue : 3 | Page : 225-226 |
Body packer syndrome
VM Kulkarni1, JA Gandhi1, RA Gupta1, RB Deokar2, ND Karnik3, MY Nadkar3
1 Department of General Surgery, Seth G. S. Medical College, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, India 2 Department of Forensic Medicine, Seth G. S. Medical College, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, India 3 Department of Medicine, Seth G. S. Medical College, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, India
Date of Web Publication | 26-Sep-2012 |
Correspondence Address: V M Kulkarni Department of General Surgery, Seth G. S. Medical College, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.101646
How to cite this article: Kulkarni V M, Gandhi J A, Gupta R A, Deokar R B, Karnik N D, Nadkar M Y. Body packer syndrome. J Postgrad Med 2012;58:225-6 |
Sir,
A 42 years old man was found unconscious at Mumbai airport. At local hospital he needed ventilator support for disordered breathing. Urine analysis revealed benzodiazepines and opiates. On 6 th day, patient passed a drug packet per rectum. It revealed cocaine. X-ray abdomen showed multiple packets [Figure 1]. Patient was referred to our center.
At our center, eleven packets were removed per rectum; each was a plastic pouch of 3×2 cm concealed with electrical tape. CT scan abdomen ruled out perforation and located the sites of remaining packets. Decision for emergency laparotomy was taken for prolonged retained packets beyond 5 days of ingestion.
On laparotomy, four gastric packets were removed via distal gastrotomy. Endoscope was passed through gastrotomy to confirm complete clearance of stomach and down to proximal jejunum. One packet found in second part of duodenum [Figure 2] which was removed via gastrotomy. Scattered packets in small intestine were milked and removed via a single ileotomy. The large intestinal packets were milked and removed per rectum. The endoscope was passed through the ileotomy and per rectally to inspect the bowel and the missed packets were removed. The small bowel that was not reachable by the endoscope was seen against its light to locate missed out packets. Of total 35 packets removed [Figure 3], 3 had ruptured outer tape. Patient recovered and had superficial wound infection.
The sensitivity of X-ray abdomen in detecting drug packets is 88%. [1] Positive urine toxicology screening does not indicate packet rupture because drug seepage is known phenomenon and some are active drug abusers. [1]
The risks to the body packer depend upon
- Nature of the drug - Cocaine toxicity is a definitive indication for laparotomy in body packers as it has no antidote. [1],[2]
- Size of the packets - The size decides the possibility of gastrointestinal obstruction needing surgery and amount of drug it can hold. Many times each packet contains higher than lethal dose of cocaine. [2]
- Integrity of packing materials - High quality packaging reduces risk of rupture, drug seepage and allows extended conservative treatment and use of more conservative surgical techniques. [3]
- Location in the gastrointestinal tract - Location decides the site and number of enterotomies. High wound infection rate is associated with enterotomy [4] and significantly increases with number of enterotomies to as high as 40%, prolonging hospital stay. [2] Proximal enterotomies have lesser complication rates and colotomy should be avoided. [1]
Surgery is reserved for patients with complications like drug intoxication, [1],[2],[5] gastrointestinal obstruction, [1],[2],[5] peritonitis, [4] perforation [2] or delayed passage beyond 5 days of conservative treatment. [1]
Aim of surgery is complete exploration and total intestinal clearance in drug overdose and relieve obstruction when intestines are obstructed. There are different methods to conduct surgery like gastrotomy, [1],[2] multiple enterotomies, [2] single enterotomy [2],[6] and packet removal per anus after milking packets distally. [1],[2],[3] Colonic non obstructing, unruptured packets may be left to be expulsed per anus naturally. [6] Resection with primary anastomosis and/or stoma is done when indicated. [4],[6] Palpation during surgery does not exclude remaining packets and can cause complications leading to reoperation. [2],[4] Postoperative mortality is reported due to pelvic abscess, [2] DIC. [4]
Before discharge, two normal packet free stools and a normal plain X-ray abdomen is recommended to confirm total clearance. [1],[5]
We did not come across any report that used intraoperative endoscopy to confirm complete clearance. Used via the mouth, rectum, enterotomy and gastrotomy it directly visualizes the complete length of the bowel and can identify a packet mixed in stools or hidden at turns, unless colon is totally loaded. It can also detect missed packets. Enteroscopy can help identify intact packets which could be safely milked to the enterotomy and ruptured packets which need to be removed without milking via separate overlying enterotomy. The packet should not be retrieved via the endoscope with any kind of grasping instrument. As use of intraoperative endoscopy prolongs operative time and should be used cautiously in hemodynamically unstable patient.
In our case, use of intra operative endoscopy helped in complete clearance, minimized the number of enterotomies and avoided post-operative investigations.
:: References | |  |
1. | Mandava N, Chang RS, Wang JH, Bertocchi M, Yrad J, Allamaneni S, et al. Establishment of a definitive protocol for the diagnosis and management of body packers (drug mules). Emerg Med J 2011;28:98-101.  [PUBMED] |
2. | Silverberg D, Menes T, Kim U. Surgery for "Body Packers": A 15-year experience. World J Surg 2006;30:541-6.  [PUBMED] |
3. | Pidoto RR, Agliata AM, Bertolini R, Mainini A, Rossi G, Giani G. A new method of packaging cocaine for international traffic and implications for the management of cocaine body packers. J Emerg Med 2002;23:149-53.  [PUBMED] |
4. | de Beer SA, Spiessens G, Mol W, Fa-Si-Oen PR. Surgery for Body Packing in the Caribean: A retrospective study of 70 Patients. World J Surg 2008;32:281-5.  [PUBMED] |
5. | Beckley I, Ansari NA, Khwaja HA, Mohsen Y. Clinical management of cocaine body packers: the Hillingdon experience. Can J Surg 2009;52:417-21.  [PUBMED] |
6. | East JM. Surgical complications of Cocaine Body-Packing: A survey of Jamaican Hospitals. West Indian Med J 2005;54:38-41.  [PUBMED] |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
This article has been cited by | 1 |
Description and evaluation of cocaine body-packers management in French Guiana (2016–2019) |
|
| Alexis Fremery, Vincent Piriou, Clémence Bonnefoy, Karim Hamiche, Hatem Kallel, Jean Pujo, Timothée Bonifay, Mathieu Nacher | | Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2023; 95: 102500 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 2 |
Body packer syndrome |
|
| Akant Arora, Sandeep Jain, Ayush Srivastava, Manish Mehta, Kartik Pancholy | | Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2021; 14(1): 51 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 3 |
Body Packer: An Experience in a Reference Hospital |
|
| Carlos A Lozano De Avila, Giovanna M Rivas Zuñiga, Katty C Square Nieves, Nayib De J Zurita Medrano, Jaime M Iglesias Medrano | | Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery. 2021; 10(1): 43 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 4 |
Imaging of body packing: errors and medico-legal issues |
|
| Alfonso Reginelli,Anna Russo,Fabrizio Urraro,Duilia Maresca,Ciro Martiniello,Alfredo D’Andrea,Luca Brunese,Antonio Pinto | | Abdominal Imaging. 2015; 40(7): 2127 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 5 |
Foreign Material in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Cocaine Packets |
|
| Nurten Turkel Kucukmetin, Bulent Gucyetmez, Tuncer Poyraz, Sadik Yildirim, Gungor Boztas, Nurdan Tozun | | Case Reports in Gastroenterology. 2014; 8(1): 56 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 6 |
Body packer syndrome |
|
| Sureka, B. and Kumar, M.M. and Mittal, A. and Mukul, S. | | Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 2013; 59(2): 166 | | [Pubmed] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
|