Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 2628  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Articlesmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (167 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Pharmacodynamics
 ::  Mechanism of action
 ::  Antibacterial sp...
 ::  Prescribing info...
 ::  Drug interactions
 ::  Clinical efficac...
 ::  Special populations
 ::  Adverse effects
 ::  Conclusions
 ::  References
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1428    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 27    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2009  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 65-68


1 Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi-110 002, India
2 Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shadhara, Delhi-110 095, India

Date of Submission28-Jul-2008
Date of Decision05-Dec-2008
Date of Acceptance09-Dec-2008
Date of Web Publication24-Feb-2009

Correspondence Address:
M Bhattacharya
Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi-110 002
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.48443

Rights and Permissions

 :: Abstract 

Infection with resistant pathogens can adversely affect clinical, microbiological and economic outcomes. New agents for the treatment of many such serious infections are acutely needed in hospital practice. Tigecycline is a novel glycylcycline antimicrobial for intravenous use. It has an expanded broad-spectrum antibacterial activity including multi-drug resistant pathogens, like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , vancomycin-resistant enterococci , multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae , extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria and Acinetobacter baumannii . Tigecycline however is not active against Proteus, Providencia and Pseudomonas species. Its currently approved indications include complicated skin and skin structure infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. It has also been found to be effective for the treatment of community- as well as hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia and bacteremia, sepsis with shock and urinary tract infections. Tigecycline appears to be a valuable treatment option for the management of superbugs, especially where conventional therapy has failed.

Keywords: Glycylcycline antibiotics, newer antibiotics, Tigecycline

How to cite this article:
Bhattacharya M, Parakh A, Narang M. Tigecycline. J Postgrad Med 2009;55:65-8

How to cite this URL:
Bhattacharya M, Parakh A, Narang M. Tigecycline. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2009 [cited 2023 Oct 2];55:65-8. Available from:

Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem worldwide, and has increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. With emerging serious infections especially nosocomial, clinicians are running short of antibiotics. There is a need to develop new agents that overcome existing mechanisms of resistance displayed by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Tigecycline (Tygacil, Wyeth) is a new FDA-approved glycylcycline antimicrobial with an expanded microbiological spectrum for intravenous (IV) use. This review aims to summarize its clinical and microbiological efficacy, safety data and explore its potential place in clinical practice and hospital formularies of the future.

 :: Pharmacodynamics Top


Similar to tetracyclines, the glycylcyclines contain a central four-ring carbocyclic skeleton, with a substitution of an N- alkyl-glycylamido group on the D-9 position, [1] which enables a broader spectrum of activity and protects against development of resistance. [2]

 :: Mechanism of action Top

Tigecycline is bacteriostatic in vitro. It inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, but with five times higher affinity than the tetracyclines. [3] It also has post antibiotic effect (PAE) ranging from 2-5 h against gram-negative bacteria to approximately 9 h against S. pneumonia. [4],[5] No cross-resistance has been observed with other antibiotic classes. [6]

 :: Antibacterial spectrum Top

Tigecycline has potent antibacterial activity against a broad spectrum of gram-positive, gram-negative and anaerobic organisms. It also has good activity against many multi-drug-resistant pathogens. [7]

Gram-positive bacteria : Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin susceptible and resistant) , Streptococcus spp, Entrococcus faecalis (vancomycin susceptible and resistant), Staphylococcus epidermidis (vancomycin susceptible and resistant), Enterococcus faecium , Listeria monocytogenes .

Gram-negative bacteria : Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Aeromonas hydrophilia, Pasteurella multocida, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter aerogenes

Anaerobic pathogens: Bacteriodes spp, Clostridium perfringes Peptoseptococcus micros .

Multi-drug-resistant pathogens: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE), Acinetobacter baumannii ; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) and tetracycline, aminoglycoside, carbapenem and fluoroquinolone-resistant, extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing and Amp C β- lactamase-producing Enterobacteiaceae . In contrast, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis and B. cepacia are higher.

Provisional tigecycline MIC breakpoints of < 2 µg/ml for susceptibility and >8 µg/ml for resistance have been proposed. [8],[9]

 :: Prescribing information Top

Indications and usage

Tigecycline is currently indicated for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).

Dosage and administration

The recommended dose is a 100 mg loading followed by 50 mg IV 12-hourly. The duration of therapy is usually 5-14 days. It is available as a 50 mg vial with lyophilized powder (stored at 2° to 8°C) for IV infusion. It is reconstituted with normal saline or 5% dextrose and infused in 100 mL normal saline or ringer lactate (maximum concentration 1 mg/mL) over 30-60 min. Reconstituted solution may be stored at room temperature for up to 24 h and at 2° to 8°C for up to 45 h. [10]


Tigecycline exhibits linear pharmacokinetics. Its plasma protein binding ranges from 71-89%. It has a large volume of distribution (500-700L, 7-9 L/kg), indicating extensive tissue distribution. Tigecycline does not undergo extensive metabolism. It works independently of the cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme system and therefore does not affect medications metabolized by these enzymes. Biliary or fecal excretion accounts for 59% of the administered dose, 32% is excreted renally and 22% is excreted unchanged in urine. [10]


It is contraindicated for use in patients with known hypersensitivity to Tigecycline. [10]

 :: Drug interactions Top

Tigecycline is moderately protein-bound and is not metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme system, explaining its lack of significant drug interactions. Tigecycline when used with warfarin demonstrated an increased C max of 38%. Although this did not result in significant changes in the International Normalized Ratio (INR), patients receiving warfarin should have regular monitoring of INR. [10] As minocycline reduces insulin requirements in diabetics and efficacy of oral contraceptives, and increases blood urea nitrogen levels in patients with renal impairment on diuretics, Tigecycline should also be used cautiously in patients taking these drugs simultaneously. [7]

 :: Clinical efficacy trials Top

Several double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCT) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of Tigecycline. The results of these trials are summarized in [Table 1].

Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSI). [11],[12],[13],[14] Tigecycline was compared with vancomycin-aztreonam combination in adults with cSSSI (defined by polymicrobial etiology, need for surgical intervention, suspected or confirmed deep soft tissue involvement and/or comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease or peripheral neuropathy.). The primary end-point was clinical response at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (12-92 days after end of treatment). Clinical cure rates were equivalent between two treatment groups. Tigecycline was also microbiologically effective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus . Overall, eradication rate for all MRSA stains were reported in 78.1% and 75.8% of Tigecycline and Vancomycin-Azteonam treated patients, respectively. Based on the results Tigecycline was non-inferior to vancomycin-aztreonam combination in the treatment of cSSIs.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). [15],[16] Tigecycline has been compared with imipenem/cilastatin in adult patients with cIAI (defined as those requiring a surgical procedure for an intra-abdominal abscess or peritonitis associated with an abscess or perforation) for 5-14 days. The primary end-point was clinical cure at the TOC visit (14-35 days after therapy). The most frequent diagnosis was complicated appendicitis. Clinical cure rates at TOC visit (14-35 days after first dose of the studt drug) were 80.6% for Tigecycline versus 82.4% for imipenem/cilastatin. The authors concluded that Tigecycline was non-inferior to imipenem/cilastatin.

Community-acquired respiratory tract infections and nosocomial pneumonia [including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)]. Fritsche et al. , [17] evaluated Tigecycline spectrum and potency against a global collection of pathogens recovered from community-acquired respiratory infections (7580 strains) or from hospitalized patients with pneumonia (3183 strains). Among community-acquired infections, the pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (52.9%; 21% ampicillin-resistant), S. pneumoniae (39.2%; 23.7% penicillin-nonsusceptible), and  Moraxella More Details catarrhalis (7.9%). Tigecycline displayed potent activity by inhibiting 100% of the three species at clinically achievable concentrations. The 10 most common pathogens producing 94.3% of nosocomial pneumonias were S. aureus (48.5% of strains; 49.4% oxacillin-resistant), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.6%), Klebsiella spp. (5.6%), S. pneumoniae (4.6%), Acinetobacter spp. (4.5%), Enterobacter spp. (4.0%),  Escherichia More Details coli (3.8%), Serratia marcescens (2.5%), Enterococcus spp. (2.3%),  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Scientific Name Search , and beta-hemolytic streptococci (1.1%). Tigecycline inhibited >96% of these pathogens (exception, P. aeruginosa ). In one study, 25 patients with VAP, bacteremia or VAP with bacteremia were treated with either Tigecycline alone or in combination with other antibiotics. Tigecycline was effective in most of these patients. [18] In a Phase III RCT Tigecycline was found to be non-inferior to levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. [19] Further clinical studies should evaluate the role of Tigecycline in the treatment of severe respiratory tract infections, both of nosocomial and community origin.

Severe sepsis with septic shock. Tigecycline resulted in markedly lowered mortality in patients with severe sepsis with shock in surgical intensive care unit. [20]

Urinary tract infections. Tigecycline has been found to be effective in eradicating infection in recurrent urosepsis. [21]

Tigecycline was approved by FDA for use in cSSI and cIAI on 28 January 2005 but the agent has shown promise in other infections as well. Tigecycline has also been approved by the European Commission and the Drug Controller General of India.

The question now is how to deploy Tigecycline. The most attractive application seems to be in surgical wound infections, particularly following abdominal surgery, where the likely pathogens include MRSA Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci and anaerobes. No other agent covers this spectrum alone. Wider empirical use in cSSSI also seems attractive, especially in settings where MRSA and gram-negative pathogens are likely. There is less obvious immediate need in those intra-abdominal infections that are likely to involve only the gut flora itself and not MRSA, where β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cephalosporins/metronidazole or carbapenem treatments remain effective in the majority of cases.

This agent should also be evaluated in other therapeutic indications such as bacterial peritonitis in renal dialysis, diabetic foot ulcer infections, osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint or tissue infections and catheter or line-related bacteremia. All these infections are often due to multi-resistant organism/s and often require parenteral antimicrobial therapy. It should be assessed in combination with other agents.

 :: Special populations Top

Hepatic insufficiency

No dosage adjustment is warranted in mild to moderate hepatic impairment (Child Pugh A and B). However, in severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh C), the initial dose should be 100 mg followed by a reduced maintenance dose of 25 mg every 12 h. [7]

Renal insufficiency

No dosage adjustment is necessary. [7]

Carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, impairment of fertility

Tigecycline is a pregnancy Category D antimicrobial. It should be avoided unless the benefit clearly outweighs the risk to the fetus. Since its secretion in breast milk is not known, women should withhold breastfeeding during treatment. [10]


Since the safety and efficacy in children less than 18 years have not been established it is not recommended below this age. [10]


No dosage adjustment is necessary. [10]

 :: Adverse effects Top

The most commonly reported adverse effects are nausea (28.4%), vomiting (19.4%), diarrhea (11.6%), local reaction at IV site (8.2%), infection (6.7%), fever (6.3%), abdominal pain (6.0%) and headache (5.6%). [7]

 :: Conclusions Top

Tigecycline appears to be a promising new antimicrobial with favorable in vitro activity against a wide variety of organisms, including multi-drug-resistant pathogens barring Proteus, Providencia and Pseudomonas species. It can be used as monotherapy in polymicrobial infections. Its present indications are cSSSIs and cIAIs, where it is non-inferior to the comparators. Other upcoming indications are hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, severe sepsis with shock and urinary tract infection.

 :: References Top

1.Pankey GA. Tigecycline. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:470-80.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Petersen PJ, Jacobus NV, Weiss WJ, Sum PE, Testa RT. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of a novel glycylcycline, the 9-t-butylglycylamido derivative of minocycline (GAR-936). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:738-44.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Bergeron J, Ammirati M, Danley D. Glycylcyclines bind to the high affinity tetracycline ribosomal binding site and evade Tet(M)- and Tet(O)- mediaed ribosomal protection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:2226-8.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.van Ogtrop ML, Andes D, Stamstad TJ, Conklin B, Weiss WJ, Craig WA, et al . In vivo pharmacodynamic activities of two glycylcyclines (GAR-936 and WAY 152, 288) against various gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:943-9.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Hoellman DB, Pankuch GA, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC. Antipneumococcal activities of GAR-936 (a new glycylcycline) compared to those of nine other agents against penicillin-susceptible and resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:1085-8.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Tygacil Philadelphia, PA: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 2006 (package insert).  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Doan TL, Fung HB, Mehta D, Riska PF. Tigecycline: A glycylcycline antimicrobial agent. Clin Thers 2006;28:1079-106.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Deshpande LM, Gales AC, Jones RN. GAR-936 (9-t-butylglycylamidominocycline) susceptibility test development for streptococci, Haemophillus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae : Prelimnary guidelines and interpretive criteria. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;18:29-35.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Quality Control Minimal Inhibitory Concenration (MIC) Limits for Broth Microdilution and MIC Interpretive Breakpoints: Informational Supplement- 2nd ed. Wayne Pa: CLSI; 2006. Document M27-S2.   Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Kasbekar N. Tigecycline: A new glycylcycline antimicrobial agent. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:1235-43.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Breedt J, Teras J, Gardovskis J, Maritz FJ, Vaasna T, Ross DP, et al . Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: Results of a double-blind Phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4658-66.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Sacchidanand S, Penn RL, Embil JM, Campos ME, Curcio D, Ellis-Grosse E, et al . Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a Phase 3 randomised double-blind trial. Int J Infect Dis 2005;9:251-61.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Postier RG, Green SL, Klein SR, Ellis-Grosse EJ, Loh E; Tigecycline 200 Study Group. Results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label efficacy and safety study of two doses of tigecycline for complicated skin and skin-structure infections in hospitalized patients. Clin Ther 2004;26:704-14.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Grosse EJ, Babinchank T, Dartois N, Rose G, Loh E; Tigecycline 300 and 305 cSSSI Study Groups. The Efficacy and Safety of Tigecycline in the Treatment of Skin and Skin-Structure Infections: Results of 2 Double-Blind Phase 3 Comparison Studies with Vancomycin-Aztreonam. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:S341-53.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Oliva ME, Rekha A, Yellin A, Pasternak J, Campos M, Rose GM, et al . A multicentric trial of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline vs. imipenem/ cilastatin in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. BMC Infect Dis 2005;5:88.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Kuti JL, Dowzicky M, Nicolau DP. A pharmacodynamic simulation to assess tigecycline efficacy for hospital-acquired pneumonia compared with other common intravenous antibiotics. J Chemother 2008;20:69-76.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
17.Fritsche TR, Sader HS, Stilwell MG, Dowzicky MJ, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline tested against organisms causing community-acquired respiratory tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;52:187-93.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
18.Schafer JJ, Goff DA, Stevenson KB, Mangino JE. Early experience with tigecycline for ventilator-associated pneumonia and bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Pharmacotherapy 2007;27:980-7.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
19.Tanaseanu C, Bergallo C, Teglia O, Jasovich A, Oliva ME, Dukart G, et al . Integrated results of 2 phase 3 studies comparing tigecycline and levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008;61:329-38.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
20.Swoboda S, Ober M, Hainer C, Lichtenstern C, Seiler C, Wendt C, et al . Tigecycline for the treatment of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A drug use evaluation in a surgical intensive care unit. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:729-33.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
21.Curcio J. Treatment of recurrent urosepsis with tigecycline: A pharmacological perspective. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:1892-3.  Back to cited text no. 21    


  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 In vitro antibacterial activities of cefiderocol against Gram-negative clinical strains isolated from China in 2020
Naoki Kohira, Meredith A Hackel, Merime Oota, Miki Takemura, Fupin Hu, Hiromichi Mizuno, Daniel F Sahm, Yoshinori Yamano
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Tigecycline: Role in the Management of cIAI and cSSTI in the Indian Context
Subramanian Swaminathan, Prithwijit Kundu
Indian Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; : 2633944721
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Effect of Coptis chinensis on Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Susceptibility in Mycobacterium abscessus
Cheng-Yin Tseng, Mao-Feng Sun, Tsai-Chung Li, Ching-Ting Lin, Rômulo Dias Novaes
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2020; 2020: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Analysis of clinical characteristics of tigecycline-induced acute pancreatitis
Weijin Fang, Dan Yi, Linli Sun, Chunjiang Wang
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2020; 45(6): 1320
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Rapid turbidimetric assay to potency evaluation of tigecycline in lyophilized powder
Lucélia Magalhães da Silva,Hérida Regina Nunes Salgado
Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2015; 110: 49
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Case-Control Study of the Risk Factors for Acquisition of Pseudomonas and Proteus Species during Tigecycline Therapy
Ga Eun Park, Cheol-In Kang, Yu Mi Wi, Jae-Hoon Ko, Woo Joo Lee, Ji Yong Lee, Sun Young Cho, Young Eun Ha, Doo Ryeon Chung, Kyong Ran Peck, Jae-Hoon Song
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015; 59(9): 5830
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 New Therapy Option for Treatment of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusKeratitis: Tigecycline
Sertan Goktas,Muhammet Guzel Kurtoglu,Yasar Sakarya,Ceyhan Ugurluoglu,Muammer Ozcimen,Rabia Sakarya,Ismail Alpfidan,Ismail Senol Ivacik,Erkan Erdogan,Abdulkadir Bukus
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2015; 31(2): 122
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Validation of a Stability-Indicating RP-LC Method for the Determination of Tigecycline in Lyophilized Powder
L. M. da Silva,H. R. N. Salgado
Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2013; 51(2): 192
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Clinical outcomes of tigecycline alone or in combination with other antimicrobial agents for the treatment of patients with healthcare-associated multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections
Y.-T. Lee,S.-M. Tsao,P.-R. Hsueh
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2013; 32(9): 1211
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Validation of a stability-indicating RP-LC method for the determination of tigecycline in lyophilized powder
Da Silva, L.M., Salgado, H.R.N.
Journal of Chromatographic Science . 2013; 51(2): 192-199
11 An update for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia pharmacotherapy: Whatæs new and where does it fit?
Debellis, H.F., Jones, M.C., Kincaid, S.E.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2012; 25(6): 569-575
12 In vitro activity of tigecycline against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative blood culture isolates from critically ill patients
S. Gupta, C. Aruna, S. Nagaraj, M. Dias, S. Muralidharan
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
13 Confronting multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a review
Ioannis K. Neonakis,Demetrios A. Spandidos,Efthimia Petinaki
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2011; 37(2): 102
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Ceftobiprole: The First Broad-Spectrum Anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Beta-Lactam
Elias B. Chahine,Adwoa O. Nornoo
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine. 2011; 3(1): 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Microbial isolation and emergence of antimicrobial resistance associated with tigecycline usage
Li-Yuan Chen, Tun-Chieh Chen, Yen-Hsu Chen, Chun-Yu Lin, Wei-Ru Lin, Po-Liang Lu
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection. 2011; 44(5): 352
[VIEW] | [DOI]
16 Confronting multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A review
Neonakis, I.K., Spandidos, D.A., Petinaki, E.
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2011; 37(2): 102-109
17 Ceftobiprole: The First Broad-Spectrum Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Beta-Lactam
Chahine, E.B., Nornoo, A.O.
Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine. 2011; 3(1): 9-16
18 Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of tigecycline for treatment of infectious disease
Cai, Y., Wang, R., Liang, B., Bai, N., Liu, Y.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2011; 55(3): 1162-1172
19 Efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of infectious diseases: a meta-analysis
Efthimia Tasina, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Stamatia Kokkali, Malamatenia Arvanitidou
The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2011;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
20 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Tigecycline for Treatment of Infectious Disease
Yun Cai, Rui Wang, Beibei Liang, Nan Bai, Youning Liu
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2011; 55(3): 1162
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Bacterial contamination of platelets and septic transfusions: Review of the literature and discussion on recent patents about biofilm treatment
Savini, V., Catavitello, C., Astolfi, D., Balbinot, A., Masciarelli, G., Pompilio, A., Quaglietta, A.M., (...), Iacone, A.
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery. 2010; 5(2): 168-176
22 Glycylcyclines - What should pharmacists know about this new class of antimicrobial?
Van Schoor, J.
SA Pharmaceutical Journal. 2010; 77(2): 27-30
23 Tigecycline: A Review of Properties, Applications, and Analytical Methods :
Lucélia Magalhães da Silva, Hérida Regina Nunes Salgado
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 2010; 32(3): 282-288
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 A European survey of antibiotic management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: current clinical opinion and practice
Dryden, M., Andrasevic, A.T., Bassetti, M., Bouza, E., Chastre, J., Cornaglia, G., Esposito, S., Voss, A.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2010; 16((SUPPL 1)): 3-30
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Prospects for the next anti-Pseudomonas drug
Page, M.G., Heim, J.
Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2009; 9(5): 558-565
26 Penicillins, cephalosporins, other beta-lactam antibiotics, and tetracyclines
Midtvedt, T.
Side Effects of Drugs Annual. 2009; 31: 413-425
27 Antibiotic therapy of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infections: is vancomycin the optimal choice for Staphylococcus aureus infections?
Stan Deresinski
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2009; 34: S43
[VIEW] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow