| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||4133 |
| Printed||133 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||199 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 335
Watson's water hammer pulse
A Khasnis, S Chatterjee
Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue A50, Cleveland-44195, Ohio, USA
Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue A50, Cleveland-44195, Ohio
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Khasnis A, Chatterjee S. Watson's water hammer pulse. J Postgrad Med 2008;54:335
We read with great interest the excellent comprehensive review titled "Watson's water hammer pulse" published in your journal.  We would like to draw attention to some additional clinically relevant information regarding this physical sign.
Babu et al. , have noted that the sensitivity of water hammer pulse in the diagnosis of aortic regurgitation (AR) varies from 38-95% depending upon the severity of AR.  The overall specificity is only 16% for all degrees of AR. They also report that the clinical sign carries a negative predictive value of 73% for any degree of AR and 95% for severe AR.  This indicates that the absence of water hammer pulse makes the diagnosis of AR less likely. The low specificity found in this study indicates that this sign may be seen in conditions other than AR and that it is probably most useful when seen in conjunction with other findings of AR on physical examination.
The water hammer pulse is believed to result from a wide pulse pressure. However, Warnes et al. , using intra-arterial radial artery measurements in five patients with severe AR demonstrated that the widened pulse pressure narrows with arm elevation. This fall in pulse pressure was associated with an increased palpated pulse. They attributed these changes to increased arterial compliance.  The pulse pressure is not wide to begin with in patients with acute AR. Therefore, a further fall in pulse pressure with limb elevation may not be as easily clinically appreciable as in patients with chronic AR. This can mask the water hammer pulse in patients with acute AR.
| :: References|| |
|1.||Suvarna JC. Watson's water hammer pulse. J Postgrad Med 2008;54:163-5. [PUBMED] |
|2.||Babu AN, Kymes SM, Carpenter Fryer SM. Eponyms and the diagnosis of aortic regurgitation: What says the evidence? Ann Intern Med 2003;138:736-42. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|3.||Babu AN, Bitar SR, Kymes SM, Isenberg C. Utility of the collapsing pulse in screening for aortic insufficiency. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:115. |
|4.||Warnes CA, Harris PC, Fritts HW. Effect of elevating the wrist on the radial pulse in aortic regurgitation: Corrigan revisited. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1551-3. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|